[1]MA Li,LIU Wenzhe,LI Yuhao.Sequential Recommendation Method Based on Adaptive Bidirectional Information Flow[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2026,47(4):100-107.[doi:10.13705/j. issn.1671-6833.2026.04.003]
Copy
Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science)[ISSN
1671-6833/CN
41-1339/T] Volume:
47
Number of periods:
2026 Issue 4
Page number:
100-107
Column:
Public date:
2026-07-10
- Title:
-
Sequential Recommendation Method Based on Adaptive Bidirectional Information Flow
- Author(s):
-
MA Li1,2, LIU Wenzhe1, LI Yuhao1
-
1. College of Information Engineering, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 052161, China; 2. Intelligent Sensor Network Engineering Research Center of Hebei Province, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang 052161, China
-
- Keywords:
-
sequential recommendation; adaptive bidirectional information flow; dynamic preference modeling; fre; quency-domain filtering; attention mechanism
- CLC:
-
TP391. 3TP183F724. 6
- DOI:
-
10.13705/j. issn.1671-6833.2026.04.003
- Abstract:
-
Abstract: To address the challenges of inefficient information fusion and noise interference in sequential recommendation, a novel method based on an adaptive bidirectional information flow was proposed. Built upon a dual‑path encoder architecture, a hierarchical history summarization module was integrated to distill long‑term user preferences, and dynamic frequency‑domain filtering was introduced to suppress data noise. The approach fully considered the dependency and interactivity between past and future information by employing an adaptive bidirectional information flow mechanism. This mechanism dynamically adjusted fusion weights via uncertainty perception, enabling a precise characterization of the evolution of user preferences. To validate its effectiveness, experiments were conducted on four public datasets including Beauty, Sports, Yelp, and ML1M. And a comparative analysis was performed against 10 mainstream methods. The experimental results demonstrated that the proposed method out‑performed the baseline models in three key metrics: NDCG, HR, and MRR. Compared to three leading baseline models of FMLP‑Rec, DualRec, and Oracle4Rec, the proposed method’s HR@20 reached 0.652 0 and 0.913 3 on the Beauty and Yelp datasets, which was 2.08 percentage points and 2.89 percentage points higher than their average performance, respectively. Furthermore, its NDCG@20 on the Beauty and Yelp datasets reached 0.394 4 and 0.564 5, outperforming the average of the three baselines by 2.67 percentage points and 2.72 percentage points, respectively.