Regional Ecological Compensation for Forest Ecosystem Service Function Security
[1]MENG Yu,LI Linlin,GUAN Xinjian,et al.Regional Ecological Compensation for Forest Ecosystem Service Function Security[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2027,48(XX):1-9.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2026.03.011]
Copy
Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science)[ISSN
1671-6833/CN
41-1339/T] Volume:
48
Number of periods:
2027 XX
Page number:
1-9
Column:
Public date:
2027-12-10
- Title:
- Regional Ecological Compensation for Forest Ecosystem Service Function Security
- Keywords:
- forest ecological compensation; ecosystem service functions; emergy analysis theory; compensation control threshold; unit value of forest resources; Luoyang; Henan
- CLC:
- X321 TV213.4
- Abstract:
- Addressing the issues of insufficient consideration for non-market ecosystem services and unclear definition of compensation control thresholds in forest ecosystem compensation, in this paper a regional ecological compensation mechanism oriented toward securing forest ecosystem service functions was proposed. Based on emergy analysis and integrated with multidisciplinary methods, a quantitative evaluation framework for forest ecosystem service functions was established. The M-K and Pettitt methods were jointly applied to the interannual sequence of functional benefits to identify abrupt changes and determine the compensation control threshold. A coupled human-nature emergy system was constructed to trace ecological and economic flows within and beyond the system, compensation standards (i. e., the unit emergy value of forest resources) was defined, and the value compensation relationship between humans and forest systems was quantified with the constraint of functional benefit thresholds. This study provided a new perspective for forest ecological compensation research. The proposed theoretical framework and methodology were applied to Luoyang City in Henan Province. Results showed that the total emergy benefits of forest ecosystem functions exhibited a steady upward trend from 2010 to 2021, with a cumulative increase of 0.37%. The year 2016 was identified as the mutation point, with a compensation control threshold of 5. 11 E+22 sej. The years 2010—2015, during which the functional benefits were below the threshold, required compensation. During this period, the total compensation value showed a fluctuating decline, decreasing from 37. 71 million yuan in 2010 to 12. 64 million yuan in 2015. The compensation value was primarily driven by the magnitude of functional benefit reduction below the threshold, which was closely linked to the abundance of key ecological elements within the forest system. Therefore, continuously enhancing forest protection and sustainable management was essential to realize the goal of harmonious coexistence between humans and nature.
- References:
-
[1] ZHANG Y Y, YANG Y J, CHEN Z X, et al. Multi-criteria assessment of the resilience of ecological function areas in China with a focus on ecological restoration[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2020, 119: 106862.
[2] 习近平. 高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗:在中国共产党第二十次全国代表大会上的报告[M]. 北京:人民出版社,2022.XI J P. Hold high the great banner of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive in unity to build a modern socialist country in all respects: report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China[M]. Beijing: People’s Publishing House,2022.
[3] 张仕超, 刘竞宇, 冉龙池, 等. 基于提高森林覆盖率目标的跨区县横向生态补偿与供需对接:以重庆市为例[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(11): 4651-4663.ZHANG S C, LIU J Y, RAN L C, et al. Cross-county horizontal ecological compensation and supply-demand docking to increase forest coverage: a case study of Chongqing[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(11): 4651-4663.
[4] SOLIÑO M, OVIEDO J L, CAPARRÓS A. Are forest landowners ready for woody energy crops? preferences for afforestation programs in Southern Spain[J]. Energy Economics, 2018, 73: 239-247.
[5] STAPP J, NOLTE C, POTTS M, et al. Little evidence of management change in California’s forest offset program[J]. Communications Earth & Environment, 2023, 4: 331.
[6] 管新建, 石悸锋, 孟钰, 等. 洛阳市生态系统服务功能价值量化及空间分异研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2023, 45(9): 111-117.GUAN X J, SHI J F, MENG Y, et al. Study on the value quantification and value space differentiation of ecosystem service function[J]. Yellow River, 2023, 45(9): 111-117.
[7] GUAN X J, XU Y J, MENG Y, et al. Emergy benefit and radiation effect of multi-dimensional service function of vegetation ecosystem[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 911: 168493.
[8] 于鲁冀, 张亚慧, 樊雷, 等. 河南省森林固碳量与碳汇价值评估[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2024, 45(3): 7-13.YU L J, ZHANG Y H, FAN L, et al. Evaluation of carbon sequestration and carbon sink value of forests in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2024, 45(3): 7-13.
[9] GARCÍA-ONTIYUELO M, ACUÑA-ALONSO C, VALE-RO E, et al. Geospatial mapping of carbon estimates for forested areas using the InVEST model and Sentinel-2: a case study in Galicia (NW Spain)[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2024, 922: 171297.
[10] 许骞骞, 曹先磊, 孙婷, 等. 中国森林碳汇潜力与增汇成本评估:基于Meta分析方法[J]. 自然资源学报, 2022, 37(12): 3217-3233.XU Q Q, CAO X L, SUN T, et al. Assessment of carbon sequestration potential and the cost of increasing carbon sequestration in China: based on meta-analysis method[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2022, 37(12): 3217-3233.
[11] CRAGO C L, FEYZOLLAHI M, HARPER R W. Solar power or forests? a cost-benefit analysis of forest land conversion in the northeastern United States[J]. Land Use Policy, 2025, 158: 107679.
[12] 王慧亮, 吴泽宁, 郭溪, 等. 基于生态环境损失的农业生态系统能值分析[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2016, 37(6): 92-96.WANG H L, WU Z N, GUO X, et al. Emergy analysis of agricultural ecosystem based on ecological environment loss[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2016, 37(6): 92-96.
[13] DA ROCHA S J S, COMINI I B, MORAIS J V T M, et al. Ecological ICMS enables forest restoration in Brazil[J]. Land Use Policy, 2020, 91: 104381.
[14] 潘鹤思, 柳洪志. 跨区域森林生态补偿的演化博弈分析——基于主体功能区的视角[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39(12): 4560-4569.PAN H S, LIU H Z. The evolutionary game analysis of cross-regional forest ecological compensation—based on the perspective of the main functional area[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2019, 39(12): 4560-4569.
[15] ARSHAD A. Linking forest ecosystem processes, functions and services under integrative social-ecological research agenda: current knowledge and perspectives[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2023, 892: 164768.
[16] EDWARDS P D, TOBIAS A J, SHEIL D, et al. Maintaining ecosystem function and services in logged tropical forests[J]. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 2014, 29(9): 511-520.
[17] 王田野, 王平, 吴泽宁, 等. 干旱胁迫下植被生态韧性研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2023, 38(8): 790-801.WANG T Y, WANG P, WU Z N, et al. Progress in the study of ecological resilience of vegetation under drought stress[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2023, 38(8): 790-801.
[18] 徐驰, 王海军, 刘权兴, 等. 生态系统的多稳态与突变[J]. 生物多样性, 2020, 28(11): 1417-1430.XU C, WANG H J, LIU Q X, et al. Alternative stable states and tipping points of ecosystems[J]. Biodiversity Science, 2020, 28(11): 1417-1430.
[19] GÜÇLÜ Y S. Improved visualization for trend analysis by comparing with classical Mann-Kendall test and ITA[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 584: 124674.
[20] RYBERG K R, HODGKINS G A, DUDLEY R W. Change points in annual peak streamflows: method comparisons and historical change points in the United States[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2020, 583: 124307.
[21] 杨青, 刘耕源. 森林生态系统服务价值非货币量核算:以京津冀城市群为例[J]. 应用生态学报, 2018, 29(11): 3747-3759.YANG Q, LIU G Y. Non-monetary accounting on forest ecosystem services value: case study of forests in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2018, 29(11): 3747-3759.
[22] 杨婷, 张代青, 沈春颖, 等. 基于能值分析的流域生态系统服务功能价值评估:以东江流域为例[J]. 水生态学杂志, 2023, 44(1): 9-15.YANG T, ZHANG D Q, SHEN C Y, et al. Valuation of river basin ecosystem services based on energy analysis: a case study of Dongjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of Hydroecology, 2023, 44(1): 9-15.
- Similar References:
Memo
-
Last Update:
2026-05-06
