[1]邬晓光,贺攀,何启光,等.陕西省连续箱梁桥底板实测竖向温度梯度研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2019,40(03):13.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.06.006]
　Wu Xiaoguang,He Pan,He Qilong,et al.Study on Measured Vertical Temperature Gradient of Continuous Box Beam Bridge in Shaanxi Province[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2019,40(03):13.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.06.006]
点击复制

陕西省连续箱梁桥底板实测竖向温度梯度研究()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
40
期数:
2019年03期
页码:
13
栏目:
出版日期:
2019-04-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on Measured Vertical Temperature Gradient of Continuous Box Beam Bridge in Shaanxi Province
作者:
邬晓光; 贺攀; 何启光; 冯宇
长安大学公路学院
Author(s):
Wu Xiaoguang; He Pan; He Qilong; Feng Yu
Highway College of Chang’an University
关键词:
桥梁工程; 连续箱梁桥; 有限元模型; 底板温度梯度; 温度效应
Keywords:
bridge engineering; continuous box girder bridge; finite element model; base plate temperature gradient; temperature effect
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.06.006
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为了建立陕西省不同地区连续箱梁桥实测温度梯度场，选取陕北、关中和陕南地区具有代表性的三座连续箱梁桥进行了连续一年的观测，通过对实测数据的拟合，建立了三个地区实测温度梯度模型，研究表明，陕西省三个地区连续刚构箱梁实测竖向最大温差各不相同，按规范中计集混凝土铺装层后计算得到，陕北地区18.6、关中地区21.2、陕南地区22.9，但均小于规范值25；与规范规定不同，实测数据显示：箱梁底板存在竖向温差，三个地区底板实测正负最大温差分别为3.5（-3.1）、2.8（-2.9）、1.5（-1.5），基于实测温度梯度，建立箱梁合龙段有限元模型，进行实测温度效应分析，结果表明：在正温度梯度中，不考虑底板竖向温度梯度的作用，对于底板的受力是偏安全的；在负温度梯度中，不考虑底板竖向温度梯度的作用，对于底板的受力将产生不利的影响，偏不安全。建议在进行连续（刚构）箱梁桥设计验算时应综合考虑底板竖向温度梯度的影响。
Abstract:
In order to establish the measured temperature gradient field of continuous box girder bridges in different areas of Shaanxi Province, three representative continuous girder bridges in northern Shaanxi, central Shaanxi and southern Shaanxi were selected for one year continuous observation. By fitting the measured temperature data, three temperature gradient models have been established. The results show that the vertical maximum temperature difference of continuous box girder bridge in three areas in Shaanxi Province is different. According to the specifications set concrete pavement, the maximum temperature of northern region is 18.6℃, the maximum temperature of central Shaanxi is 21.2℃, the maximum temperature of southern Shaanxi is 22.9℃, but were less than the standard value of 25℃. Different from the normative provisions, the measured data show that there is vertical temperature difference in the bottom plate of the box girder, the maximum positive and negative temperature differences of the bottom plate in the three regions were 3.5℃ (-3.1℃), 2.8℃ (-2.9℃) and 1.5℃ (-1.5℃). Based on the measured temperature gradient, the finite element model of the box girder closure section was established, and the measured temperature effect was analysed. The results showed that in the positive temperature gradient , without considering the vertical temperature gradient effect of the bottom plate, it is partial safety; in the negative temperature gradient, not taking into account the effect of vertical temperature gradient of the bottom plate, the force would have a negative impact for bottom plate, impartial security. It is suggested that the vertical temperature gradient of the bottom plate should be considered comprehensively in the design checking of continuous (rigid frame) box girder bridge

相似文献/References:

[1]张岗,贺拴海..非稳对流模式下混凝土箱梁内生热场与计算方法[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2010,31(04):11.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.04.003]
[2]白桦,刘健新,胡庆安..大跨度半拱式异形桥梁抗风性能研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2010,31(05):22.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.05.006]
[3]张俊光,刘永健,姚晓荣,等.刚性悬索加劲钢桁梁桥结构参数敏感性分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2010,31(05):55.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.05.014]
[4]任翔,何青,佟阳,等.混凝土桥塔温度场和空间应力场分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2011,32(02):62.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2011.02.016]
[5]闫磊,任伟..FRP加固桥梁受弯构件的可靠性分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2011,32(02):80.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2011.02.020]
[6]吝红育,刘永健,任翔..矩形钢管混凝土桁架静力性能非线性有限元分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2011,32(05):15.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2011.05.004]
[7]蒋培文,贺拴海,宋一凡,等.多车辆一大跨连续梁桥耦合振动响应分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2011,32(05):91.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2011.05.023]
[8]高小妮,贺拴海,宋一凡..基于两类结构形式的索梁锚固区力学行为分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2012,33(06):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2012.06.014]
　GAO Xiaoni,HE Shuanhai,SONG Yifan.Mechanical Behavior Analysis of Cable-Girder Anchorage Based onTwo Kinds of Structure Form[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2012,33(03):59.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2012.06.014]
[9]胡圣能..桥梁景观评价的集对分析模型[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2013,34(04):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.04.009]
　HU Sheng-neng.Set Pair Analysis Model for Bridge Landscape Assessment[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2013,34(03):36.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.04.009]
[10]刘龄嘉,邵妍,贺拴海..公路桥梁横向防落梁设施抗震性能评价[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2013,34(06):72.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.06.018]
　LIU Lingjial,SHAO Yan,HE Shuanhai.Seismic Behavior Evaluation for HighwayBridge’S Side Retainer[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2013,34(03):72.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.06.018]

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-04-16