[1]单玉麟,黄福云,罗小烨,等.整体桥台后大不平衡土压力计算方法研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2022,43(02):84-90.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.02.012]
　Shan Yulin,Huang Fuyun,Luo Xiaoyi,et al.The Study on Calculation Method of Larger Unbalanced Earth Pressure of Backfill Behind Abutment in Integral Abutment Jointless Bridges (IAJBs)[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2022,43(02):84-90.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.02.012]
点击复制

整体桥台后大不平衡土压力计算方法研究()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
43卷
期数:
2022年02期
页码:
84-90
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-02-27

文章信息/Info

Title:
The Study on Calculation Method of Larger Unbalanced Earth Pressure of Backfill Behind Abutment in Integral Abutment Jointless Bridges (IAJBs)
作者:
单玉麟; 黄福云; 罗小烨; 陈宝春
福州大学土木工程学院;

Author(s):
Shan Yulin; Huang Fuyun; Luo Xiaoyi; Chen Baochun;
School of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University;

关键词:
Keywords:
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.02.012
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究车辆重载等引起的台后大不平衡土压力的变化，本文开展了有无考虑台后大不平衡土压力影响的整体式桥台-H型钢桩-土相互作用拟静力试验研究，分析对比台后大不平衡土压力大小、分布规律及其计算方法。研究结果表明：在本文试验条件下，随着位移荷载的增加，AHP模型台后土压力由“三角形”分布变为“梯形”分布；而LAHP模型台后土压力呈“梯形”分布。LAHP模型的台后土压力系数整体上大于AHP模型的。研究结果还表明：现有的台后土压力系数计算方法不适用于整体桥。如当△/H=0.012时，AHP和LAHP模型的台后土压力系数远大于公路桥涵设计通用规范（JTG D60-2015）中主动土压力系数Kac和静止土压力系数K0。另外，AHP和LAHP模型的台后土压力系数均超过了Coulomb被动土压力系数，也远大于现有的计算方法。
Abstract:
In order to study the variation of larger unbalanced earth pressure of backfill behind abutment caused by vehicle load, several reciprocating low-cycle pseudo-static tests on interaction of soil-abutment-steel H-pile with or without considering the effect of unbalanced earth pressure of backfill behind abutment were carried out. A comparative study was performed to find magnitude, distribution law and calculation method of larger unbalanced earth pressure of backfill behind abutment. The test results indicated that under the test conditions of this paper, with the increase of displacement load, the distribution law of earth pressure for the AHP model changes from "triangle" distribution to "trapezoidal" distribution. The distribution law of earth pressure for the LAHP model is a "trapezoidal" distribution. The earth pressure coefficient for LAHP model is larger than that of AHP model under the reciprocating displacement loading. The test results also indicated that the existing calculation method of earth pressure coefficient is not applicable to IAJBs. The earth pressure coefficient of AHP and LAHP models are significantly larger than active earth pressure coefficient Kac and earth pressure coefficient at rest K0 from the code of General Specifications for Design of Highway Bridges and Culverts (JTG D60-2015) when ∆/H reaches 0.012 (∆/H=0.012). In addition, the earth pressure coefficient for AHP and LAHP models exceed the Coulomb theory when ∆/H reaches 0.012 (∆/H=0.012). They are also larger than the existing theoretical calculation methods.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘世忠,刘永健,程高,等.公路桥梁车桥耦合振动数值分析方法[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(01):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.022]
　Liu ShizhongLiu YongjianCheng GaoWang XuLi NaZhao Mingwei.Numerical Analysis Method of Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration for Highway Bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2014,35(02):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.022]
[2]周云岗.基于迭代分析的多塔悬索桥合理成桥状态确定方法[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(01):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.023]
　Zhou Yungang.Analysis method of reasonable finished dead state of multi-town suspension bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2014,35(02):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.023]
[3]杜朝伟,郑开勋,蔡迎春,等.碳化腐蚀预应力空心板疲劳特性试验研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2018,39(01):36.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.01.029]
　Du Chaowei,Zheng Yuanxun,Cai Yingchun,et al.Experimental Study on Fatigue Characteristics of Prestressed Hollow Slab under Carbonation Corrosion[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2018,39(02):36.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.01.029]
[4]梁 岩,张卓航,班亚云,等.多跨连续梁-刚构桥地震易损性分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2023,44(01):96.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.04.003]
　LIANG Y,ZHANG Z H,BAN Y Y,et al.Seismic Fragility Analysis of Multi-span Continuous Girder-rigid Frame Bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2023,44(02):96.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.04.003]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-02-25