[1]梁 岩,张卓航,班亚云,等.多跨连续梁-刚构桥地震易损性分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2023,44(01):96-102.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.04.003]
　LIANG Yan,ZHANG Zhuohang,BAN Yayun,et al.Seismic Fragility Analysis of Multi-span Continuous Girder-rigid Frame Bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2023,44(01):96-102.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.04.003]
点击复制

多跨连续梁-刚构桥地震易损性分析()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
44
期数:
2023年01期
页码:
96-102
栏目:
出版日期:
2022-12-06

文章信息/Info

Title:
Seismic Fragility Analysis of Multi-span Continuous Girder-rigid Frame Bridges
作者:
梁 岩;  张卓航;  班亚云;  王 艳
郑州大学土木工程学院,河南郑州 450001

Author(s):
LIANG Yan;  ZHANG Zhuohang;  BAN Yayun;  WANG Yan
School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China
关键词:
Keywords:
bridge engineering;  seismic performance;  fragility;  pier;  durability
分类号:
U442. 5
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.04.003
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为研究多跨连续梁-刚构桥地震易损性，本文基于OpenSEES平台，建立实际桥梁非线性地震反应分析模型，通过增量动力分析，建立不同桥墩、支座及桥台等桥梁构件易损性曲线，分析了全寿命周期内桥梁关键抗震构件桥墩的时变地震易损性，采用界限法估算桥梁结构系统的失效概率，研究算例桥梁的系统易损性。分析表明：在同一损伤状态下，1#与4#桥墩较易出现损伤，5#桥墩其次，2#和3#桥墩的概率最小，即墩高、材料强度及墩顶约束均会影响其易损性；桥台处支座相比于桥墩处支座，更易产生损伤；两桥台易损性曲线斜率较大，其发生同一损伤的概率无明显差别；全寿命周期内耐久性损伤后桥墩轻微损伤、中等损伤及严重破坏的超越概率显著增大，中等损伤状态下的超越概率，分别增大3.1%、11.3%、20.9%、29.1%、34.1%，严重损伤状态下，分别增大3.9%、13.5%、25.1%、33.4%、35.4%；桥梁系统易损性大于各构件，采用单个构件易损性来评估桥梁易损性会高估桥梁抗震性能。
Abstract:
In order to study the seismic fragility of multi-span continuous girder-rigid frame bridges, based on OpenSEES platform, a non-linear seismic response analysis model of the actual bridge was established. Through incremental dynamic analysis, fragility curves of bridge components such as piers, supports, and abutments were established. Time-varying seismic fragility of piers of key anti-seismic components of bridges in the whole life cycle was analyzed. The failure probability of bridge structure system was estimated by boundary method, and system fragility of bridges was studied as an example. The analysis results showed that in the same damage state, 1# and 4# piers were more likely to be damaged, followed by 5# piers, and 2# and 3# piers had the least probability, as to the pier height, material strength and restraint of pier crest all affected its fragility. The bearing at abutment was more likely to cause damage than the bearing at pier; the slope of the fragility curves of the two abutments was larger, and there was no significant difference in their probability of the same damage. The probability of slight, medium and serious damage of pier increased significantly after endurance damage in the whole life cycle, moderate damage state beyond the probability increased by 3.1%, 11.3%, 20.9%, 29.1%, 34.1%, respectively, and severe damage state increased by 3.9%, 13.5%, 25.1%, 33.4%, 35.4%, respectively. Bridge systems were more fragile than individual components, and using the fragility of a single component to evaluate the fragility of the bridge could overestimate the seismic performance of the bridge.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中华人民共和国交通运输部. 公路桥梁抗震性能评价 细则:JTG / T 2231-02—2021[ S] . 北京:人民交通出版 社,2021. 

Ministry of Transport of the People′s Republic of China. Guidelines for aseismic performance evaluation of highway bridges: JTG / T 2231 - 02—2021 [ S ] . Beijing: China Communications Press, 2021. 
[2] 梁岩, 闫士昌, 赵博洋, 等. 近断层高速铁路刚构桥 地震易损性分析[ J] . 郑州大学学报( 工学版) , 2022, 43(4) : 80-85, 91. 
LIANG Y, YAN S C, ZHAO B Y, et al. Seismic fragility analysis of rigid frame bridge near-fault high-speed railway[ J ] . Journal of Zhengzhou university ( engineering science) , 2022, 43(4) : 80-85, 91. 
[3] 户东阳. 渝昆高铁典型连续梁桥地震易损性分析[ J] . 铁道科学与工程学报,2021,18(2) :297-305. 
HU D Y. Seismic vulnerability analysis of typical continuous girder bridges of Chongqing-Kunming high-speed railway[ J] . Journal of railway science and engineering, 2021, 18(2) : 297-305.
[4] 王君. 基于 IDA 的高速铁路连续梁桥地震易损性研究 [D] . 兰州:兰州交通大学,2017. 
WANG J. Seismic fragility study on the continuous beam bridge over high-speed railway based on IDA method [D] . Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiatong University, 2017. 
[5] 陈伟,王冠,杜彦良,等. 高速铁路连续梁桥近断层地 震易损 性 分 析 [ J] . 哈 尔 滨 工 程 大 学 学 报, 2020, 41 (2) :212-218. 
CHEN W, WANG G, DU Y L, et al. Vulnerability analysis of the continuous high-speed railway bridge under near-fault earthquake[ J] . Journal of Harbin engineering university, 2020, 41(2) : 212-218. 
[6] BASOEZ N, KIREMIDJIAN A S. Evaluation of bridge damage data from the Loma Prieta and Northridge, California 211 earthquakes [R] . New York: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, 1998: 1-163.
[7] 梁岩,闫佳磊,班亚云,等. 多跨连续刚构桥梁地震易 损性损伤指 标 计 算 方 法 [ J] . 铁 道 科 学 与 工 程 学 报, 2019,16(6) :1466-1475. 
LIANG Y, YAN J L, BAN Y Y, et al. Analysis of calculation method for seismic fragility index of multi span continuous rigid frame bridge[ J] . Journal of railway science and engineering, 2019, 16(6) : 1466-1475. 
[8] 夏玉领. 耐久性损伤钢筋混凝土柱节点反复荷载试验 研究[D] . 长沙:中南大学,2014. 
XIA Y L. Experimental study under cyclic loading on durably damaged reinforced concrete column joint [ D ] . Changsha: Central South University, 2014.
[9] 张菊辉. 基于数值模拟的规则梁桥墩柱的地震易损性 分析[D] . 上海:同济大学,2006. 
ZHANG J H. Study on seismic vulnerability analysis of normal beam bridge piers based on numerical simulation [D] . Shanghai: Tongji University, 2006.
[10] 班亚云. 考虑近海耐久性损伤的混凝土梁桥时变地 震易损性分析[D] . 郑州:郑州大学,2018. 
BAN Y Y. Analysis of time-varying seismic vulnerability of concrete bridges with durability damage in coastal waters[D] . Zhengzhou: Zhengzhou University, 2018.
[11] CORNELL C A,JALAYER F,HAMBURGER R O,et al. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines[ J] . Journal of structural engineering, 2002,128(4) :526-533. 
[12] MACKIE K R, STOJADINOVI C ’ B. R-factor parame-terized bridge damage fragility curves[ J] . Journal of bridge engineering,2007,12(4) :500-510. 
[13] 中国工程建筑标准化协会. 混凝土结构耐久性评定标 准: CECS 220—2007 [ S ] . 北 京: 中 国 计 划 出 版 社,2007. 
China Association for Engineering Construction Standardization. Standard for durability assessment of concrete structures: CECS 220—2007[S]. Beijing, 2007. 
[14] CORNELL C A. Bounds on the reliability of structural systems[ J] . Journal of the structural division, 1967, 93 (1) :171-200. [15] DITLEVSEN O, MADSEN H O. Structural reliability methods [M] . New York: Wiley, 1996:1-59.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘世忠,刘永健,程高,等.公路桥梁车桥耦合振动数值分析方法[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(01):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.022]
　Liu ShizhongLiu YongjianCheng GaoWang XuLi NaZhao Mingwei.Numerical Analysis Method of Vehicle-Bridge Coupling Vibration for Highway Bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2014,35(01):94.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.022]
[2]周云岗.基于迭代分析的多塔悬索桥合理成桥状态确定方法[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2014,35(01):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.023]
　Zhou Yungang.Analysis method of reasonable finished dead state of multi-town suspension bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2014,35(01):99.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2014.01.023]
[3]杜朝伟,郑开勋,蔡迎春,等.碳化腐蚀预应力空心板疲劳特性试验研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2018,39(01):36.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.01.029]
　Du Chaowei,Zheng Yuanxun,Cai Yingchun,et al.Experimental Study on Fatigue Characteristics of Prestressed Hollow Slab under Carbonation Corrosion[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2018,39(01):36.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2018.01.029]
[4]单玉麟,黄福云,罗小烨,等.整体桥台后大不平衡土压力计算方法研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2022,43(02):84.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.02.012]
　SHAN Yulin,HUANG Fuyun,LUO Xiaoye,et al.Study on Calculation Method of Larger Unbalanced Earth Pressure of Backfill behind Abutment in Integral Abutment Jointless Bridges[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2022,43(01):84.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2022.02.012]
[5]高丹盈,魏东,朱海堂,等.钢纤维高强混凝土边节点能量耗散研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2010,31(02):4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.001]
　GAO Danying,WEI Dong,ZHU Haiting,et al.Study on energy dissipation of steel fiber high-strength concrete edge nodes[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2010,31(01):4.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.001]
[6]王新玲,王坤,牛学娇,等.角钢和碳纤维布复合加固损伤框架抗震试验研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2010,31(02):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.002]
　WANG Xinling,WANG Kun,Niu Xuejiao,et al.Seismic test study on angle steel and carbon fiber cloth composite reinforcement damage frame[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2010,31(01):8.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.002]
[7]阎西康,马康,延华,等.两层两跨带施工缝混凝土框架抗震性能研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2013,34(01):14.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.01.004]
[8]王统宁,靳启文,胡兆同,等.连续梁桥施工阶段地震响应及抗震性能评估[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2013,34(04):19.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.04.005]
[9]戎贤,贾楠,李艳艳..PHC管桩抗震性能试验研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2013,34(04):24.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2013.04.006]
[10]王会丽,李升才..蜂窝钢梁-混凝土柱组合节点抗震性能试验研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2008,29(02):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2008.02.009]
　Wang Huili,Li Shengcai.Experimental study on seismic performance of honeycomb steel beam-concrete column composite joint[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2008,29(01):35.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2008.02.009]

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-07