[1]李宗坤,王特,葛巍,等.基于WBS-RBS和AHP的港珠澳大桥人工岛建设风险分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2020,41(03):62-66.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2020.02.019]
 Li ZongkunWang TeGe WeiSong Ziyuan.Risk analysis of artificial island construction of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge based on WBS-RBS and AHP[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2020,41(03):62-66.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2020.02.019]
点击复制

基于WBS-RBS和AHP的港珠澳大桥人工岛建设风险分析()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
41
期数:
2020年03期
页码:
62-66
栏目:
出版日期:
2020-07-29

文章信息/Info

Title:
Risk analysis of artificial island construction of Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge based on WBS-RBS and AHP
作者:
李宗坤王特葛巍宋子元
郑州大学水利科学与工程学院
Author(s):
Li ZongkunWang TeGe WeiSong Ziyuan
College of Water Conservancy Science and Engineering, Zhengzhou University
关键词:
人工岛港珠澳大桥层次分析法风险因素权重风险度
Keywords:
artificial islands' target="_blank" rel="external">">artificial islandsHong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridgeanalytic hierarchyrisk factorsWeightdegree of risk
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2020.02.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
港珠澳大桥人工岛建设系统复杂、不确定因素多. 本文构建了WBS-RBS判断矩阵对各建设阶段的风险因素进行识别,运用AHP方法和风险度理论计算各指标层的权重和风险度,并按照5级风险标准对该工程进行综合评价. 结果表明,港珠澳大桥人工岛建设总体风险水平为3级中等风险,与工程实际相符合,说明该方法是合理可行的,可为类似工程建设风险评价体系的构建提供借鉴和参考.
Abstract:
The construction system of artificial island of Hong Kong-Zhui-Macao Bridge is complex and uncertain. This paper constructed the WBS-RBS judgment matrix to identify the risk factors in each construction stage, calculated the weight and risk degree of each index layer by using AHP method and risk degree theory, and evaluated the project comprehensively according to the five-level risk standard. The result shows that the overall risk level of the artificial island construction of the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge is 3-level medium risk, which is in line with the actual project. It indicates that the method is reasonable and feasible, and can provide reference for the construction of risk evaluation system for similar projects.
更新日期/Last Update: 2020-07-29