[1]董其伍,王烨,刘敏珊..流动冲击角对流体绕流管束换热的影响[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2010,31(02):0.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.017]
 Dong Qiwu,WANG Ye,Liu Minshan.The effect of flow impact angle on heat transfer around the flow tube bundle[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2010,31(02):0.[doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.017]
点击复制

流动冲击角对流体绕流管束换热的影响()
分享到:

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
31卷
期数:
2010年02期
页码:
0
栏目:
出版日期:
2010-02-02

文章信息/Info

Title:
The effect of flow impact angle on heat transfer around the flow tube bundle
作者:
董其伍王烨刘敏珊.
郑州大学,热能工程研究中心,河南,郑州,450002, 郑州大学,热能工程研究中心,河南,郑州,450002, 郑州大学,热能工程研究中心,河南,郑州,450002
Author(s):
Dong Qiwu; WANG Ye; Liu Minshan
关键词:
流动冲击角 绕流管束 局部换热 数值模拟
Keywords:
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2010.02.017
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
运用计算流体动力学软件FLUENT,对流动冲击角分别为45°、60°、75°和90°,流体绕流6排87根错排管束下的换热进行三维数值模拟.管束的纵向和横向管间距分别为9.5 mm和11 mm.考查管束的平均换热努赛尔数和模型进出口压降,并与茹卡乌斯卡斯的实验关联式进行对比,当雷诺数为5 000~20 000时,给出4种流动冲击角下管束换热努赛尔数的拟合公式,并对管周向局部换热特点进行细观分析.结果表明:湍流边界层在周向夹角为大约105°时从管壁面分离,此时换热最差;流动冲击角越大,管束的平均换热努赛尔数和模型进出口压降越大;流动冲击角为45°时综合换热性能较好.
Abstract:
Using the computational fluid dynamics software FLUENT, the heat transfer under the flow impact angle of 45°, 60°, 75° and 90°, and the fluid flows around 6 rows and 87 staggered tube bundles is simulated in 9D. The longitudinal and transverse tube spacings of the tube bundle were 5.11 mm and 5 mm, respectively.The average heat transfer Nussel number and model inlet and outlet pressure drop of the tube bundle were investigated, and compared with the experimental correlation formula of Rukauskas, when the Reynolds number was 000 20~000 4, the fitting formula of Nussel number of the tube bundle under the flow impact angle was given, and the local heat transfer characteristics of the tube circumference were meso-analyzed. The results show that the turbulent boundary layer is separated from the pipe wall when the circumferential angle is about 105°, and the heat transfer is the worst. The larger the flow impact angle, the greater the average heat exchange Nussel number of the tube bundle and the pressure drop at the inlet and outlet of the model. When the flow impact angle is 45°, the comprehensive heat transfer performance is better.

更新日期/Last Update: 1900-01-01