[1]周　科.河南省非确定性土地利用优化规划研究[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2025,46(02):135-142.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.02.014]
　ZHOU Ke.Study on Uncertainty Land Use Optimization and Planning in Henan Province[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2025,46(02):135-142.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.02.014]
点击复制

河南省非确定性土地利用优化规划研究()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
46
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
135-142
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-03-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on Uncertainty Land Use Optimization and Planning in Henan Province
文章编号:
1671-6833(2025)02-0135-08
作者:
周　科
华北水利水电大学,河南郑州450011
Author(s):
ZHOU Ke
North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450011, China
关键词:
土地利用; 非确定性; 适宜性评价; 区间概率模型; 规划管理
Keywords:
land use;  uncertainties;  suitability evaluation;  interval probabilistic model;  planning and management
分类号:
F301.24
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.02.014
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
以土地利用适宜性为基础,研究了非确定性影响下土地利用优化格局。 将地理信息系统(GIS)与区间概率规划(IPP)技术相结合,构建区间概率非确定性土地利用规划管理(IPP-LUPM)模型。 首先,基于GIS数据,进行土地利用适宜性评价。 其次,以不同类型土地利用最大面积和各类约束条件为输入,用IPP-LUPM模型优化土地利用面积,得出非确定性条件下土地利用优化方案和效益。 以河南省为例,计算结果表明:当土地利用适宜性i= 1,非确定性概率p=0.01 水平时,土地利用效益为[4.78,5.55]万亿元;当 i=1,p=0.5 水平时,土地利用效益为[9. 66,10. 44]万亿元。 适宜性条件越好,土地利用效益越高,但同时带来的生态环境风险也相应偏大。 构建的模型方法可为解决非确定性条件下土地利用优化方案提供有效途径,对于土地利用格局和管理方案优化分析具有重要的参考价值。
Abstract:
The land use pattern with uncertainty influences was deeply studied based on land use suitability. The geographic information system (GIS) and interval probability planning (IPP) technology was combined to build a land use planning management (IPP-LUPM) model. Firstly, land use suitability evaluation was carried out based on GIS data. Secondly, taking the maximum area of different land use types and the constraints as input, the IPPLUPM model was used to optimize land use area and to obtain land use optimum schemes with uncertainties. Taking Henan Province as an example, it was shown by the study results that when the land use suitability i=1, uncertainty probability p=0.01 level,[4.78, 5.55] trillion Yuan could be obtained for the land use benefit, when i=1, p=0.5,[9.66, 10.44] trillion Yuan could be obtained for the land use benefit. The greater the suitability level, the higher the land proposed benefit could be, and the greater the ecological environmental risks would be. It was shown by the results that the model could provide an effective way to solve the land use optimization under uncertainty conditions. It was of important reference value to optimize the land use pattern and management scheme.

参考文献/References:

[1]戴文远, 江方奇, 黄万里, 等. 基于“三生空间” 的土地利用功能转型及生态服务价值研究: 以福州新区为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2018, 33(12): 2098-2109. 

DAI W Y, JIANG F Q, HUANG W L, et al. Study on transition of land use function and ecosystem service value based on the conception of production, living and ecological space: a case study of the Fuzhou New Area[J]. Journal of Natural Resources, 2018, 33(12): 2098-2109. 
[2]傅伯杰. 生态系统服务与生态安全[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2013. 
FU B J. Ecosystem service and ecology safety[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2013. 
[3]刘永强, 廖柳文, 龙花楼, 等. 土地利用转型的生态系统服务价值效应分析: 以湖南省为例[J]. 地理研究, 2015, 34(4): 691-700.
LIU Y Q, LIAO L W, LONG H L, et al. Effects of land use transitions on ecosystem services value: a case study of Hunan Province[J]. Geographical Research, 2015, 34(4): 691-700. 
[4]欧阳晓, 贺清云, 朱翔. 多情景下模拟城市群土地利用变化对生态系统服务价值的影响: 以长株潭城市群为例[J]. 经济地理, 2020, 40(1): 93-102. 
OUYANG X, HE Q Y, ZHU X. Simulation of impacts of urban agglomeration land use change on ecosystem services value under multi-scenarios: case study in ChangshaZhuzhou-Xiangtan urban agglomeration[J]. Economic Geography, 2020, 40(1): 93-102. 
[5]LIN Q G, HUANG G H. IPEM: an interval-parameter energy systems planning model[J]. Energy Sources, Part A: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 2008, 30(14/15): 1382-1399. 
[6]吕立刚, 周生路, 周兵兵, 等. 区域发展过程中土地利用转型及其生态环境响应研究: 以江苏省为例[J]. 地理科学, 2013, 33(12): 1442-1449. 
LU L G, ZHOU S L, ZHOU B B, et al. Land use transformation and its eco-environmental response in process of the regional development: a case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2013, 33(12): 1442-1449. 
[7]CALLESEN I. Biodiversity and ecosystem services in lifecycle impact assessment-inventory objects of impact categories[J]. Ecosystem Services,2016,22:94-103. 
[8]WACKERNAGEL M,REES W E. Perceptual and structural barriers to investing in natural capital:economics from an ecological footprint perspective[J]. Ecological Economics,1997,20(1):3-24. 
[9]肖长江,欧名豪,李鑫.基于生态-经济比较优势视角的建设用地空间优化配置研究———以扬州市为例[J].生态学报,2015,35(3):696-708. 
XIAO C J, OU M H, LI X. Research on spatial optimum allocation of construction land in an eco-economic comparative advantage perspective———a case study of Yangzhou City[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2015, 35(3): 696-708. 
[10]陈红, 史云扬, 柯新利, 等. 生态与经济协调目标下的郑州市土地利用空间优化配置[J]. 资源科学, 2019, 41(4): 717-728. 
CHEN H, SHI Y Y, KE X L, et al. Spatial optimization of land use based on the objective of coordinated ecological protection and economic development in Zhengzhou City[J]. Resources Science, 2019, 41(4): 717-728. 
[11]WANG H R, GAO Y Y, LIU Q, et al. Land use allocation based on interval multi-objective linear programming model: a case study of pi County in Sichuan Province [J]. Chinese Geographical Science, 2010, 20(2): 176-183. 
[12] BATTESE G E, COELLI T J. Frontier production functions, technical efficiency and panel data: with application to paddy farmers in India[J]. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1992, 3(1): 153-169. 
[13]李辉, 顾荣华, 朱玉林. 土地出让对长江中游城市群经济辐射的影响效应与形成机制研究[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2020, 29(1): 35-43. 
LI H, GU R H, ZHU Y L. Effect of land transfer on the economic radiation of urban agglomerations in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River and its formation mechanism [J]. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 2020, 29(1): 35-43. 
[14]王良健, 李辉. 中国耕地利用效率及其影响因素的区域差异: 基于281个市的面板数据与随机前沿生产函数方法[J]. 地理研究, 2014, 33(11): 1995-2004. 
WANG L J, LI H. Cultivated land use efficiency and the regional characteristics of its influencing factors in China: by using a panel data of 281 prefectural cities and the stochastic frontier production function[J]. Geographical Research, 2014, 33(11): 1995-2004. 
[15]顾荣华, 朱玉林. 区域土地利用对国土空间生态优化的影响机理及实证研究: 以江苏省为例[J]. 经济地理, 2021, 41(11): 201-208. 
GU R H, ZHU Y L. Impact machanism of regional land use on the ecological optimization: a case study of Jiangsu Province[J]. Economic Geography, 2021, 41(11): 201-208. 
[16]年福华, 姚士谋. 城市建设过程中节约用地途径探讨[J]. 地域研究与开发, 2002, 21(1): 18-21. 
NIAN F H, YAO S M. Ways of land use in the process of urban development in China[J]. Areal Research and Development, 2002, 21(1): 18-21. 
[17]冯光. 关于河南省土地资源可持续利用问题的思考[J]. 资源·产业, 2000, 2(11): 44-46. 
FENG G. Thoughts on the sustainable utilization of land resources in Henan Province[J]. Resources & Industries, 2000, 2(11): 44-46. 
[18]吴荣涛, 蔡慧敏. 河南省土地资源可持续利用路径分析[J]. 河南农业科学, 2007, 36(3): 77-81. 
WU R T, CAI H M. Path analysis of sustainable use of land resources in Henan[J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2007, 36(3): 77-81. 
[19]史晨璐, 吴秀芹. 喀斯特断陷盆地土地利用对生态系统生产力的影响[J]. 北京大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 56(2): 341-351. 
SHI C L, WU X Q. Impact of land use on ecosystem productivity in Karst faulted basin[J]. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 2020, 56(2): 341351. 
[20]王良健, 李辉, 石川. 中国城市土地利用效率及其溢出效应与影响因素[J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(11): 1788-1799. 
WANG L J, LI H, SHI C. Urban land-use efficiency, spatial spillover, and determinants in China[J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(11): 1788-1799. 
[21]黄贤金,曹大贵.南京江北新区储备土地效益提升的政策建议[J].土地经济研究,2015(2):23-51. 
HUANG X J, CAO D G. Policy suggestions on improving the land reserve benefit in Nanjing Jiangbei New Area [J]. Research on land economy,2015(2):23-51. 
[22]张泊平, 吴国玺, 李荷香. 河南省土地资源利用现状与可持续利用模式研究[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36 (24): 10610-10611. 
ZHANG B P, WU G X, LI H X. Study on the current status and sustainable utilization models of land resources in Henan Province[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008, 36(24): 10610-10611.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-13