[1]陶洁,周翔宇,李金晶,等.基于WRF模式的伊洛河流域场次降雨模拟与分析[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2027,48(XX):1-8.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2027.01.007]
　TAO Jie,ZHOU Xiangyu,LI Jinjing,et al.Simulation and Analysis of Event-based Rainfall in the Yiluo River Basin Based on the WRF Model[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2027,48(XX):1-8.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2027.01.007]
点击复制

基于WRF模式的伊洛河流域场次降雨模拟与分析()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
48
期数:
2027年XX
页码:
1-8
栏目:
出版日期:
2027-12-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Simulation and Analysis of Event-based Rainfall in the Yiluo River Basin Based on the WRF Model
作者:
陶洁1,2，周翔宇1，李金晶3,4，赵启家1
1. 郑州大学 水利与交通学院,河南 郑州 450001;2. 河南省水循环模拟与水环境保护国际联合实验室,河南 郑州450001;3. 黄河水利委员会黄河水资源中心,河南 郑州 450003;4. 华北水利水电大学 黄河研究院,河南 郑州 450046
Author(s):
TAO Jie1,2, ZHOU Xiangyu1, LI Jinjing3,4, ZHAO Qijia1
1. School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 2. Henan International Joint Laboratory of Water Cycle Simulation and Environmental Protect, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 3. Yellow River Water Resources Center, Yellow River Conservancy Commission, Zhengzhou, 45003, China; 4. Yellow River Institute, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450046, China
关键词:
WRF模式; 降雨模拟; 微物理方案; 下垫面更新; 伊洛河流域
Keywords:
WRF model;  rainfall simulation;  microphysics scheme;  land-surface update;  Yiluo River basin
分类号:
P426.6；P456.7
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2027.01.007
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对伊洛河流域地形起伏剧烈、降雨空间差异明显,且场次降雨模拟及微物理方案适用性研究相对较少、逐时动态过程研究仍不充分的问题,基于 WRF 模式对伊洛河流域 2021—2024 年 5 场典型降雨过程进行模拟,采用全球数据同化系统(GDAS)的 FNL 数据作为初始场与边界条件,评估不同微物理方案与下垫面条件对典型降雨过程的影响。 结果表明:WRF 模式能够较好地再现伊洛河流域场次降雨的时空分布特征;但 Kessler、Lin、WSM6、Thompson 和 Eta 5 种微物理方案对降雨中心的位置和累积雨量、场次降雨的面平均雨量、累积雨量空间分布和逐时动态过程的模拟仍存在一定偏差,其中降雨中心累积雨量与面平均雨量整体偏大;Eta 方案综合表现相对稳定;更新下垫面数据后,模拟的降雨中心累积值整体降低约 6%,场次降雨的降雨中心和时空过程的模拟效果均明显提升。
Abstract:
To address the limited studies on event-based rainfall simulation, the applicability of microphysicsschemes, and the hourly evolution of rainfall processes in the Yiluo River basin, where complex topography and pronounced spatial variability of rainfall pose challenges to rainfall simulation, five typical rainfall events during2021-2024 were simulated using the Weather Research and Forecasting ( WRF) model. The FNL data from theGlobal Data Assimilation System (GDAS) were used as the initial boundary conditions to evaluate the effects of different microphysics schemes and land-surface conditions on typical rainfall processes. The results showed that theWRF model reasonably reproduced the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of event-based rainfall in the YiluoRiver basin. However, the five microphysics schemes, namely Kessler, Lin, WSM6, Thompson, and Eta, still exhibited certain deviations in simulating the locations and accumulated rainfall of rainfall centers, basin-mean rainfall, the spatial distribution of accumulated rainfall, and the hourly evolution of rainfall processes. The accumulatedrainfall at rainfall centers and basin-mean rainfall were generally overestimated. Among the five schemes, the Etascheme showed relatively stable overall performance. After the land-surface data were updated, the simulated accumulated rainfall at the rainfall centers decreased by approximately 6% overall, and the simulations of rainfall centers and the spatiotemporal evolution of rainfall processes were significantly improved.

参考文献/References:

[1].包红军,王莉莉,沈学顺,等. 气象水文耦合的洪水预报研究进展[J]. 气象, 2016, 42(9): 1045-1057.
[2].BAO H J, WANG L L, SHEN X S, et al. A review: Advances of flood forecasting of hydro-meteorological forecast technology[J]. Meteorological Monthly, 2016, 42(9): 1045-1057.
[3].张金萍,张朝阳,左其亭. 极端暴雨下城市内涝模拟与应急响应能力评估[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2023, 44(2): 30-37.
[4].ZHANG J P, ZHANG Z Y, ZUO Q T. Urban waterlogging simulation and emergency response capacity evaluation under extreme rainstorms[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2023, 44(2): 30-37.
[5].POWERS J G, KLEMP J B, SKAMAROCK W C, et al. The Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Overview, system efforts, and future directions[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2017, 98(8): 1717-1737.
[6].MAUSSION F, SCHERER D, FINKELNBURG R, et al. WRF simulation of a precipitation event over the Tibetan Plateau, China: An assessment using remote sensing and ground observations[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2011, 15: 1795-1817.
[7].于伟, 彭杨, 姚礼双, 等. WRF模式不同参数化方案对长江上游降雨模拟的影响[J]. 中国农村水利水电, 2023(5): 98-105.
[8].YU W, PENG Y, YAO L S, et al. Effects of different parameterization schemes of WRF model on rainfall simulation in the Upper Yangtze River Basin[J]. China Rural Water and Hydropower, 2023(5): 98-105.
[9].张金萍,曾苜翔,郭元. 基于WRF的郑州市暴雨中心最大时降雨过程模拟分析[J]. 水资源与水工程学报, 2022, 33(3): 1-11.
[10].ZHANG J P, ZENG M X, GUO Y. Simulation analysis of maximum hourly rainfall process in Zhengzhou rainstorm center based on WRF[J]. Journal of Water Resources & Water Engineering, 2022, 33(3): 1-11.
[11].钟泽文,易善桢,谢文豪. WRF模式不同参数化方案对石羊河流域降水模拟的影响[J]. 水电能源科学, 2021, 39(8): 6-9.
[12].ZHONG Z W, YI S Z, XIE W H. Influence on precipitation simulation by using different of parameterization schemes in WRF model in Shiyang River Basin[J]. Water Resources and Power, 2021, 39(8): 6-9.
[13].陶洁,赵启家,赵阳,等. 岷江上游降水数值模拟研究[J]. 水文, 2025, 45(4): 37-45.
[14].TAO J, ZHAO Q J, ZHAO Y, et al. Numerical simulation of precipitation in the Upper Minjiang River Basin[J]. Journal of China Hydrology, 2025, 45(4): 37-45.
[15].Xu, H., Zhao, D., Yin, J., et al. (2023). Indirect Effects of Binary Typhoons on an Extreme Rainfall Event in Henan Province, China From 19 to 21 July 2021. 3. Sensitivities to Microphysics Schemes. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128(7).
[16].CHEN N, WANG R. Spatial differences in the response of runoff to climate and land use changes in the Yiluo River Basin[J]. Journal of Resources and Ecology, 2024, 15(5): 1299-1310.
[17].梁国付,丁圣彦. 气候和土地利用变化对径流变化影响研究——以伊洛河流域伊河上游地区为例[J]. 地理科学, 2012, 32(5): 635-640.
[18].LIANG G F, DING S Y. The impacts of climate and landuse changes on the runoff effects: Case in the upper reaches of the Yihe River, the Yiluo River Basin[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2012, 32(5): 635-640.
[19].刘侃,陈超辉,何宏让,等. 基于局地增长模培育法的对流可分辨尺度WRF模式对河南“21·7”特大暴雨的预报评估[J]. 大气科学学报, 2023, 46(5): 725-737.
[20].LIU K, CHEN C H, HE H R, et al. Assessment of the convection-allowing scale WRF model using LBGM theory: A case study of severe torrential rain in Henan Province, July 2021[J]. Transactions of Atmospheric Sciences, 2023, 46(5): 725-737.
[21].甘容,徐孟莎,左其亭. 伊洛河流域基流分割及其时空变化特征[J]. 资源科学, 2022, 44(9): 1824-1834.
[22].GAN R, XU M S, ZUO Q T. Baseflow separation and spatiotemporal variation characteristics in the Yiluo River basin[J]. Resources Science, 2022, 44(9): 1824-1834.
[23].刘松韬,张东,李玉红,等. 伊洛河流域河水来源及水化学组成控制因素[J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(3): 1184-1196.
[24].LIU S T, ZHANG D, LI Y H, et al. Water sources and factors controlling hydro-chemical compositions in the Yiluo River Basin[J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(3): 1184-1196.
[25].MONIN A S, OBUKHOV A M. Basic laws of turbulent mixing in the surface layer of the atmosphere[J]. Contributions of the Geophysical Institute of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR, 1954, 151: 163-187.
[26].TEWARI M, CHEN F, WANG W, et al. Implementation and verification of the unified Noah land surface model in the WRF model[C]//Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/16th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction. Seattle: American Meteorological Society, 2004: 11-15.
[27].IACONO M J, DELAMERE J S, MLAWER E J, et al. Radiative forcing by long-lived greenhouse gases: Calculations with the AER radiative transfer models[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2008, 113(D13): D13103.
[28].JANJIĆ Z I. The step-mountain Eta coordinate model: Further developments of the convection, viscous sublayer, and turbulence closure schemes[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1994, 122(5): 927-945.
[29].KAIN J S. The Kain–Fritsch convective parameterization: An update[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2004, 43(1): 170-181.
[30].KESSLER E. On the distribution and continuity of water substance in atmospheric circulations[M]. Boston: American Meteorological Society, 1969.
[31].LIN Y L, FARLEY R D, ORVILLE H D. Bulk parameterization of the snow field in a cloud model[J]. Journal of Climate and Applied Meteorology, 1983, 22(6): 1065-1092.
[32].HONG S Y, LIM J O J. The WRF single-moment 6-class microphysics scheme (WSM6)[J]. Journal of the Korean Meteorological Society, 2006, 42(2): 129-151.
[33].THOMPSON G, FIELD P R, RASMUSSEN R M, et al. Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part II: Implementation of a new snow parameterization[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2008, 136(12): 5095-5115.
[34].FERRIER B S, JIN Y, LIN Y, et al. Implementation of a new grid-scale cloud and precipitation scheme in the NCEP Eta model[C]//Proceedings of the 19th Conference on Weather Analysis and Forecasting/15th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction. San Antonio: American Meteorological Society, 2002: 280-283.
[35].HODSON T O. Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): When to use them or not[J]. Geoscientific Model Development, 2022, 15: 5481-5487.
[36].谈灿灿,张润润,邓志民,等.基于暴雨空间自相关性的降水量插值方法比较[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2024,52(6):8-14.
[37].TAN C C, ZHANG R R, DENG Z M, et al. Comparison of precipitation interpolation methods considering spatial autocorrelation of rainstorm precipitation[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 2024, 52(6): 8-14+29.

更新日期/Last Update: 2026-10-30