[1]窦明,米庆彬,张佳男,等.黄河坝下湿地不同景观类型植被演变特征及驱动力[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2027,48(XX):1-9.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2026.03.021]
　DOU Ming,MI Qingbin,ZHANG Jianan,et al.Study on the Evolution Characteristics and Driving Forces of Vegetation in Different Landscape Types of the Wetland Below the Yellow River Dam[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2027,48(XX):1-9.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2026.03.021]
点击复制

黄河坝下湿地不同景观类型植被演变特征及驱动力()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
48
期数:
2027年XX
页码:
1-9
栏目:
出版日期:
2027-12-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Study on the Evolution Characteristics and Driving Forces of Vegetation in Different Landscape Types of the Wetland Below the Yellow River Dam
作者:
窦明1,2, 米庆彬1, 张佳男3, 许林军4, 杜宗达3, 许伟伟3
1. 郑州大学 水利与交通学院,河南 郑州 450001;2. 郑州大学 生态与环境学院,河南 郑州 450001;3. 河南省海河流域水利事务中心,河南 新乡 453005;4. 河南省西霞院水利枢纽输水及灌区工程建设管理局,河南 焦作 454002
Author(s):
DOU Ming1,2, MI Qingbin1, ZHANG Jianan3, XU Linjun4, DU Zongda3, XU Weiwei
1. School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 2. School of Ecological and Environmental, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 3. Henan Haihe River Basin Water Resources Affairs Center, Zhengzhou 453005, China; 4. Water Conservancy and Irrigation District Engineering Construction Administration of Xixia Yuan Water Conservancy Project, Jiaozuo 454002, China
关键词:
景观类型; 植被群落特征; 植被覆盖度; 反演模型; 地上生物量
Keywords:
landscape type;  characteristics of vegetation communities;  vegetation coverage;  inversion model;  aboveground biomass
分类号:
P33；P901
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2026.03.021
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为摸清湿地不同景观类型植被群落特征演变及驱动力，对黄河中游西霞院坝下吉利黄河湿地不同景观类型植被群落的生长特征和多样性特征的演变规律进行研究。通过原位调查实验、遥感影像解译，构建基于随机森林的草本植被地上生物量反演模型，分析不同景观类型植被群落的生长特征和多样性特征的演变规律，识别环境因子对不同景观类型植被群落特征演变的驱动作用。结果表明：研究区植被覆盖度等级以高植被覆盖为主，其次是较高植被覆盖；草本植被平均地上生物量整体处于较低植区和中植区，2018—2023年平均地上生物量呈增大-减小-增大的变化趋势，分别于2019年和2022年达到最大值和最小值，平均地上生物量分别为331 g·m⁻²和244 g·m⁻²；滩涂湿地植被表现出湿生植物、中生植物与盐生植物共生的特征；土壤养分因子与植被群落年内特征变化具有显著的相关关系，土地利用类型变化对植被覆盖度有显著影响，尤其是受人类活动影响较大的中等、低植被覆盖区域。
Abstract:
To understand the evolution of vegetation community characteristics and driving forces in different landscape types, the evolvement rule of the growth and diversity characteristics of vegetation communities in different landscape types of the Jili Yellow River Wetland downstream of the Xixia Yuan Dam in the middle reaches of the Yellow River were studied. Through on-site investigation, remote sensing image interpretation, and constructing aboveground biomass inversion model of herbaceous vegetation based on random forest, the growth characteristics and diversity characteristics of vegetation communities in different landscape types were analyzed, and the driving effects of environmental factors on the evolution of vegetation community characteristics in different landscape types were identified. The results showed that the vegetation coverage grade in the study area was mainly high vegetation coverage, followed by relatively high vegetation coverage. The average aboveground biomass of herbaceous vegetation was generally in the low and medium plant zones, and showed a trend of increase-decrease-increase from 2018 to 2023, reaching the maximum and minimum values in 2019 and 2022, respectively, with 331 g·m⁻² and 244 g·m⁻². The vegetation in the tidal flat wetland showed the characteristics of coexistence of hygrophytes, mesophytes and halophytes. Soil nutrient factors had a significant correlation with the intra-annual characteristics changes of the vegetation communities in tidal flat wetland. While the land use types changes had a significant impact on vegetation coverage, especially in the areas with medium and low vegetation coverage that were more significantly.

参考文献/References:

[1] XU T, WENG B S, YAN D H, et al. Wetlands of international importance: status, threats, and future protection[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019, 16(10): 1818.
[2] 万俊锋, 宋一帆, 郭林, 等. 人为干扰对黄河湿地植物群落的影响及其机制[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2024, 45(4): 102-110.WAN J F, SONG Y F, GUO L, et al. Effects of human disturbances on plant community of the Yellow River wetland and its mechanisms[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2024, 45(4): 102-110.
[3] MZURI R T, OMAR A A, MUSTAFA Y T. Spatiotemporal analysis of vegetation cover and its response to terrain and climate factors in duhok governorate, Kurdistan Region, Iraq[J]. The Iraqi Geological Journal, 2021, 54(1A): 110-126.
[4] NING L N, PENG W F, YU Y N, et al. Quantifying vegetation change and driving mechanism analysis in Sichuan from 2000 to 2020[J]. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, 11: 1261295.
[5] 王士俊, 刘苗, 赵钰, 等. 多源遥感数据耦合CBA-Wheat模型的冬小麦生物量估算研究[J]. 遥感学报, 2024, 28(12): 3123-3135.WANG S J, LIU M, ZHAO Y, et al. Estimating winter wheat biomass by coupling the CBA-Wheat model and multispectral remote sensing[J]. National Remote Sensing Bulletin, 2024, 28(12): 3123-3135.
[6] QIU M Q, LIU Y X, CHEN P, et al. Spatio-temporal changes and hydrological forces of wetland landscape pattern in the Yellow River Delta during 1986—2022[J]. Landscape Ecology, 2024, 39(3): 51.
[7] 杨菲菲, 张王菲, 赵磊, 等. 基于GF-1数据的二阶段遥感特征优选与森林地上生物量反演模型[J]. 林业科学, 2025, 61(4): 9-19.YANG F F, ZHANG W F, ZHAO L, et al. Two-stage remote sensing feature optimization and GF-1 data-supported forest above-ground biomass inversion[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2025, 61(4): 9-19.
[8] RUA-FUENTES I, VILLAMIZAR-PEÑA L A, MANTILALA-CARREÑO J A, et al. Functional diversity and species diversity in flooded and unflooded tropical forests[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2022, 114: 103814.
[9] 李瑶, 戴文鸿, 高嵩, 等. 黄河下游植被覆盖度动态变化及其与水沙过程关系[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(4): 31-37, 52.LI Y, DAI W H, GAO S, et al. Vegetation dynamic variation and its relations with water-sediment processes in lower Yellow River[J]. Yellow River, 2022, 44(4): 31-37, 52.
[10] 杜鹏举, 孙煜航, 赵志杰, 等. 黄河下游宽滩区及其沿线植被覆盖度变化特征[J]. 人民黄河, 2022, 44(7): 99-104.DU P J, SUN Y H, ZHAO Z J, et al. Study on the variation characteristics of vegetation coverage along the lower Yellow River floodplain[J]. Yellow River, 2022, 44(7): 99-104.
[11] LV X F, MA B, YU J B, et al. Bacterial community structure and function shift along a successional series of tidal flats in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6: 36550.
[12] 李雅, 于秀波, 刘宇, 等. 湿地植物功能性状对水文过程的响应研究进展[J]. 生态学杂志, 2018, 37(3): 952-959.LI Y, YU X B, LIU Y, et al. Response of wetland plant functional traits to hydrological processes: a review[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2018, 37(3): 952-959.
[13] GRYGORUK M, KOCHANEK K, MIROSLAW-SWITALATEK D. Analysis of long-term changes in inundation characteristics of near-natural temperate riparian habitats in the Lower Basin of the Biebrza Valley, Poland[J]. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 2021, 16: 100844.
[14] HOPPENREIJS J H T, ECKSTEIN R L, LIND L. Pressures on riparian vegetation: a literature review[J]. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 2022, 9: 806130.
[15] 李志娟, 肖宇童, 吕佳霖, 等. 不同土地利用方式对黄河(河南段)桃花峪滩区土壤酶活性的影响[J]. 湿地科学, 2024, 22(6): 922-929.LI Z J, XIAO Y T, LYU J L, et al. Effects of different land use types on soil enzyme activity in Taohuayu floodplain of the Henan section of Yellow River[J]. Wetland Science, 2024, 22(6): 922-929.
[16] MENG L, QU F Z, BI X L, et al. Elemental stoichiometry (C, N, P) of soil in the Yellow River Delta nature reserve: understanding N and P status of soil in the coastal estuary[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2021, 751: 141737.
[17] SILKNETTER S, CREED R P, BROWN B L, et al. Positive biotic interactions in freshwaters: a review and research directive[J]. Freshwater Biology, 2020, 65(4): 811-832.
[18] 马红斌, 王庆, 王秦湘. 基于NDVI的多沙粗沙区植被覆盖度研究[J]. 人民黄河, 2012, 34(12): 94-95, 111.MA H B, WANG Q, WANG Q X. Research of vegetation coverage in the coarse sand area based on NDVI[J]. Yellow River, 2012, 34(12): 94-95, 111.
[19] 孙玉真, 王志泰, 包玉, 等. 城市遗存山体植物群落特征对不同人为干扰方式及强度的响应[J]. 生态学报, 2023, 43(11): 4632-4650.SUN Y Z, WANG Z T, BAO Y, et al. Response of plant community characteristics of urban remnant mountains to different ways and intensity of artificial disturbance[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2023, 43(11): 4632-4650.
[20] YU M F, TAO Y X, LIU W Z, et al. C, N, and P stoichiometry and their interaction with different plant communities and soils in subtropical riparian wetlands[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2020, 27(1): 1024-1034.
[21] 曾国燕, 叶茂, 李苗苗, 等. 阿尔泰山富蕴地区草地群落生物量、物种多样性及其与环境因子的相关性[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2025, 53(4): 120-131.ZENG G Y, YE M, LI M M, et al. Biomass and species diversity of grassland communities and their correlation with environmental factors in Fuyun area, Altai Mountains[J]. Journal of Northwest A & F University (Natural Science Edition), 2025, 53(4): 120-131.
[22] LIN S X, FAN C Y, WANG J, et al. Chronic anthropogenic disturbance mediates the biodiversity-productivity relationship across stand ages in a large temperate forest region[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2024, 61(3): 502-512.
[23] YUAN Z Q, ALI A, WANG S P, et al. Temporal stability of aboveground biomass is governed by species asynchrony in temperate forests[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2019, 107: 105661.
[24] LUO Y H, CADOTTE M W, BURGESS K S, et al. Greater than the sum of the parts: how the species composition in different forest strata influence ecosystem function[J]. Ecology Letters, 2019, 22(9): 1449-1461.
[25] 宋红丽, 牟晓杰, 刘兴土. 人为干扰活动对黄河三角洲滨海湿地典型植被生长的影响[J]. 生态环境学报, 2019, 28(12): 2307-2314.SONG H L, MOU X J, LIU X T. Anthropogenic effect on wetland vegetation growth in the Yellow River Delta[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2019, 28(12): 2307-2314.
[26] 苗晨, 申双和, 贾根锁. 华北平原不同生长发育期作物长势对气候因子的响应研究[J]. 气候与环境研究, 2014, 19(6): 703-712.MIAO C, SHEN S H, JIA G S. Response of cropland NDVI to climatic factors during different phenophases in the North China Plain[J]. Climatic and Environmental Research, 2014, 19(6): 703-712.

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2025-11-20;修订日期:2026-01-06
基金项目:河南省自然科学基金资助项目( 242300421224) ;河南省西霞院水利枢纽输水及灌区工程科研项目( XXYSS /GQ-KYXM-05) ;郑州大学院士团队科研启动项目(13432340370)
作者简介:窦明(1975— ),男,山东桓台人,郑州大学教授,博士,博士生导师,主要从事水资源与水环境研究,E-mail:dou_ming@ 163. com。
通信作者:米庆彬(1988— ) ,男,河南开封人,郑州大学博士研究生,主要从事水资源与水环境研究,E-mail:miqingbin1119@ 126. com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2026-04-27