[1]李　芬,刘亦韬,赵澳权.水位变化对浸水拓宽路基渗流特征和稳定性的影响[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2025,46(02):127-134.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.02.008]
点击复制

水位变化对浸水拓宽路基渗流特征和稳定性的影响()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
46
期数:
2025年02期
页码:
127-134
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-03-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Impact of Water Level Changes on Seepage Characteristics and Stability of Soaking Widened Subgrade
文章编号:
1671-6833(2025)02-0127-08
作者:
李　芬1; 刘亦韬1; 赵澳权1; 2
1. 武汉理工大学船海与能源动力工程学院,湖北武汉430063;2.安徽江淮汽车集团股份有限公司,安徽合肥230022
Author(s):
LI Fen1, LIU Yitao1, ZHAO Aoquan1,2
关键词:
拓宽路基; 水位变化; 渗流特征; 稳定性
Keywords:
widening subgrade;  water level change;  seepage characteristics;  stability
分类号:
U416.1
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.02.008
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
沿河路基长期受单侧水位变动的影响,会加大路基整体失稳的风险。 为分析浸水拓宽路基在水位季节变动情况下的渗流特征和稳定性,基于FLAC3D 软件的二次开发实现对路基渗流特性的实时计算,并在此基础上对土体强度参数进行修正,研究水位季节变动对拓宽路基稳定性的影响。 结果表明:在路基近水面一定区域内,不同时间相同水位下路基孔隙水压和饱和度曲线随水平距离的分布规律不同;高水位期其曲线形成类似滞回圈形态,中间区域的孔隙水压和饱和度在水位下降期大于水位上升期;低水位期其曲线在一定深度处交汇,但近水区域的孔隙水压和饱和度在水位下降期大于水位上升期;迎水面边坡安全系数随水位季节变化变动幅度较大,最大达22%,背水面受其影响较小,变化幅度仅为4.5%;迎水面边坡安全系数变化趋势与水位季节变化趋势成呈相关,背水面则截然相反;水位季节性涨落过程中,最不利工况在水位达到峰值时出现,潜在滑动面出现在背水面新旧路基结合处。
Abstract:
The subgrade along the river was affected by unilateral water level changes for a long time, which could increase the risk of overall instability of the subgrade. In order to analyze the seepage characteristics and stability of the flooded widened subgrade with the condition of seasonal change of water level, the seepage characteristics of the subgrade were calculated in real time based on the secondary development of FLAC3D software, and the soil strength parameters were corrected on this basis, and the influence of seasonal change of water level on the stability of the widened subgrade was studied. The results showed that the distribution of pore water pressure and saturation curves of subgrade with horizontal distance was different at the same water level at different times in a certain area near the water surface of the subgrade. During the high water level period, the curve formed a hysteresis circle-like shape, and the pore water pressure and saturation in the middle region were greater than those in the water level rise period. In the low water level period, the curves converge at a certain depth, but the pore water pressure and saturation in the near water area were greater than those in the water level rise period. The safety factor of the frontal slope varied greatly with the seasonal change of water level, with a maximum of 22%, while the backwater surface was less affected by it, with a variation of only 4.5%. The change trend of safety factor of frontal slope was positively correlated with the seasonal trend of water level, while that of backwater surface was diametrically opposite. In the process of seasonal fluctuations of water level, the most unfavorable condition occurred when the water level reached its peak, and the potential sliding surface appeared at the junction of the old and new subgrade on the backwater.

参考文献/References:

[1]郭建湖. 水塘地区高速铁路浸水路基结构优化设计研究[J]. 铁道工程学报, 2020, 37(12): 54-58, 69.

GUO J H. Optimization design of soaking subgrade of high-speed railway in pond area[J]. Journal of Railway Engineering Society, 2020, 37(12): 54-58, 69. 
[2]任蓉. G5安康段水毁路基稳定性及防治技术研究[D]. 西安: 西安工业大学, 2024. 
REN R. Study on stability and prevention technology of subgrade damaged by water in G5 Ankang section[D]. Xi’an: Xi’an Technological University, 2024. 
[3]邓友生, 孟丽青, 蔡梦真, 等. 水泥土搅拌桩加固黄土路基稳定性研究[J]. 郑州大学学报(工学版), 2022, 43(3): 59-66. 
DENG Y S, MENG L Q, CAI M Z, et al. Research on stability of loess roadbed reinforced with cement-soil mixing piles[J]. Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science), 2022, 43(3): 59-66. 
[4]张俊荣, 陈保国, 易贤龙, 等. 两侧水位变化时路堤渗流特征及稳定性分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2017, 34 (2): 35-41. 
ZHANG J R, CHEN B G, YI X L, et al. Analysis on seepage characteristics and stability of embankment with water level change on both sides[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2017, 34 (2): 35-41. 
[5]陈龙飞,林棋文,邓安,等.饱和-非饱和渗流作用下土质库岸路基稳定性分析[J].路基工程,2024(6):191-197. 
CHEN L F,LIN Q W,DENG A,et al.Stability analysis of soil reservoir bank subgrade under saturation-unsaturated seepage[J]. Subgrade Engineering,2024(6):191-197. 
[6]LIU G D, ZHOU Z J, XU S Q, et al. Hysteresis of dam slope safety factor under water level fluctuations based on the LEM coupled with FEM method[J]. Computer Modeling in Engineering & Sciences, 2022, 133(2): 351-375. 
[7]何忠明, 史振宁, 付宏渊, 等. 水位下降对沿湖路堤边坡渗流特征及稳定性的影响[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 45(9): 3227-3233. 
HE Z M, SHI Z N, FU H Y, et al. Influence of water decline on seepage characteristic and slope stability of embankment along lake[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2014, 45(9): 3227-3233. 
[8]李清华, 肖田, 邱博超, 等. 水位变化对路基边坡渗流场及稳定性影响分析[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2022, 22(13): 5403-5410. 
LI Q H, XIAO T, QIU B C, et al. Analysis of influence of water level change on seepage field and stability of subgrade slope[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2022, 22(13): 5403-5410. 
[9]刘修宇. 季节性浸水软土区路基稳定性研究[D]. 南京: 东南大学, 2018. 
LIU X Y. Study on stability of subgrade in seasonal immersed soft soil area[D]. Nanjing: Southeast University, 2018. 
[10] BINIYAZ A, AZMOON B, LIU Z. Coupled transient saturated-unsaturated seepage and limit equilibrium analysis for slopes: influence of rapid water level changes[J]. Acta Geotechnica, 2022, 17(6): 2139-2156. 
[11]李刚, 郭艳玲. 高速公路改扩建新旧路基差异沉降影响因素分析[J]. 公路交通科技, 2021, 38(7): 22-28. 
LI G, GUO Y L. Analysis on influencing factors of differential settlement of new and old subgrade in expressway reconstruction and extension[J]. Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development, 2021, 38 (7): 22-28. 
[12]吴珺华, 袁俊平, 杨松. 基于滤纸法的裂隙膨胀土土水特征曲线试验[J]. 水利水电科技进展, 2013, 33 (5): 61-64. 
WU J H, YUAN J P, YANG S. Experimental study on SWCC of expansive soil with cracks using filter paper method[J]. Advances in Science and Technology of Water Resources, 2013, 33(5): 61-64. 
[13]袁以堂, 张杜锋, 吴春伟, 等. 高速公路改扩建软基换填拓宽段地基变形分析[J]. 公路, 2023, 68(3): 86-89. 
YUAN Y T, ZHANG D F, WU C W, et al. Analysis of foundation deformation in widening section of soft foundation replacement for expressway reconstruction and expansion[J]. Highway, 2023, 68(3): 86-89.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-03-13