[1]葛 巍,李浩东,张亚东,等.河道治理工程潜在生命效益量化方法[J].郑州大学学报(工学版),2025,46(04):114-120.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.04.002]
　GE Wei,LI Haodong,ZHANG Yadong,et al.Quantitative Method for Potential Life Benefits of River Treatment Projects[J].Journal of Zhengzhou University (Engineering Science),2025,46(04):114-120.[doi:10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.04.002]
点击复制

河道治理工程潜在生命效益量化方法()
分享到：

《郑州大学学报(工学版)》[ISSN:1671-6833/CN:41-1339/T]

卷:
46
期数:
2025年04期
页码:
114-120
栏目:
出版日期:
2025-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Quantitative Method for Potential Life Benefits of River Treatment Projects
文章编号:
1671-6833(2025)04-0114-07
作者:
葛 巍1;  李浩东1;  张亚东1;  孙向鹏2;  周延卫2;  李宗坤1
1. 郑州大学 水利与交通学院,河南 郑州 450001;2. 河南贾鲁河环境综合治理有限公司,河南 郑州 450001
Author(s):
GE Wei1;  LI Haodong1;  ZHANG Yadong1;  SUN Xiangpeng2;  ZHOU Yanwei2;  LI Zongkun1
1. School of Water Conservancy and Transportation, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China; 2. Henan Jialu River Environmental Comprehensive Treatment Co. , Ltd. , Zhengzhou 450001, China
关键词:
河道治理工程;  统计生命价值;  潜在生命效益;  生命损失;  频率法
Keywords:
river treatment projects;  value of statistical life;  potential life benefits;  loss of life;  frequency method
分类号:
TV87
DOI:
10.13705/j.issn.1671-6833.2025.04.002
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对生命价值难量化导致河道治理工程潜在生命效益被忽略的问题,提出了河道治理工程防洪效益中潜在生命效益量化方法。 结合洪水生命损失,引入收入弹性系数法计算统计生命价值,构建洪水生命损失货币价值量化函数;对水利工程防洪效益计算的频率法进行简化,提出了基于统计生命价值的河道治理工程潜在生命效益量化方法。 将该方法应用于贾鲁河综合治理工程,结果表明:工程多年平均潜在生命效益为 3 073. 54 万元 / a,其中中牟县占比 39. 5%,周口市川汇区、西华县、扶沟县和尉氏县城区共占比 38. 7%,沿线非城镇区域占比 21. 8%,河道治理工程的潜在生命效益主要在城区和人口密集区域。 通过量化防洪效益中潜在生命效益,完善了水利工程防洪效益计算理论及方法。
Abstract:
Aiming at the problem that the potential life benefits of river treatment projects are ignored due to the difficulty in quantifying the value of life, a quantification method for the potential life benefits in the flood control benefits of river treatment projects was proposed. Combined with the loss of life caused by floods, the income elasticity coefficient method was introduced to calculate the statistical value of life, and a quantification function for the monetary value of the loss of life caused by floods was constructed. The frequency method for calculating the flood control benefits of water conservancy projects was simplified, and a quantification method for the potential life benefits of river treatment projects based on the statistical value of life was proposed. The method was applied to the comprehensive treatment project of the Jialu River. The results showed that the average potential life benefits of the project over many years was 30. 735 4 million yuan / a. Among them, Zhongmu County accounted for 39. 5%, Chuanhui District of Zhoukou City, Xihua County, Fugou County and the urban area of Weishi County together accounted for 38. 7%, and the non-urban areas along the line accounted for 21. 8%. The potential life benefits of river treatment projects are mainly in urban areas and densely populated areas. By quantifying the potential life benefits in flood control benefits, the calculation theory and method of flood control benefits of water conservancy projects were improved.

参考文献/References:

[1] 中华人民共和国水利部. 2022 年全国水利发展统计 公报[M] . 北京: 中国水利水电出版社, 2023. 

Ministry of Water Resources of the People′s Republic of China. 2022 statistic bulletin on China water activities [M] . Beijing: China Water & Power Press, 2023. 
[2] 李宗坤, 王特, 葛巍, 等. 考虑溃坝后果的水库工程 等级划分方法[ J] . 水科学进展, 2023, 34( 5) :753 - 765. 
LI Z K, WANG T, GE W, et al. Research on the rank classification method of reservoir projects considering dam failure consequences [ J ] . Advances in Water Science, 2023, 34(5) : 753-765. 
[3] BOTZEN W J W, MONTEIRO É, ESTRADA F, et al. Economic assessment of mitigating damage of flood events: cost-benefit analysis of flood-proofing commercial buildings in Umbria, Italy [ J] . The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance-Issues and Practice, 2017, 42( 4) : 585-608. 
[4] HUDSON P, BOTZEN W J W. Cost-benefit analysis of flood-zoning policies: a review of current practice [ J ] . WIREs Water, 2019, 6(6) : e1387. 
[5] 王艳艳, 王静, 胡昌伟,等. 太湖流域应对特大洪水防洪 工程效益模拟[J]. 水科学进展, 2020, 31(6): 885-896. 
WANG Y Y, WANG J, HU C W, et al. Benefit simulation of flood control project in Taihu Lake basin under extreme floods[ J]. Advances in Water Science, 2020, 31 (6): 885-896. 
[6] 杨丽, 申碧峰, 王强. 北京市中心城防洪防涝系统效 益分析[ J] . 人民长江, 2017, 48(20) : 6-9, 34. 
YANG L, SHEN B F, WANG Q. Benefit analysis of flood control and waterlogging prevention system for downtown of Beijing[J]. Yangtze River, 2017, 48(20): 6-9, 34. 
[7] 陈卫宾, 曹廷立, 李保国, 等. 人民治理黄河 70 年防 洪保护 区 防 洪 效 益 分 析 [ J ] . 人 民 黄 河, 2016, 38 (12) : 11-14. 
CHEN W B, CAO T L, LI B G, et al. Benefit of flood protected area in lower Yellow River in recent 70 years [ J] . Yellow River, 2016, 38(12) : 11-14.
[8] BROWN C A, GRAHAM W J. Assessing the threat to life from dam failure[ J] . Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 1988, 24(6) : 1303-1309. 
[9] DEKAY M L, MCCLELLAND G H. Predicting loss of life in cases of dam failure and flash flood [ J ] . Risk Analysis, 1993, 13(2) : 193-205. 
[10] GRAHAM W J. A procedure for estimating loss of life caused by dam failure [ J] . Sedimentation & River Hydraulics, 1999, 6(5) : 21-43. 
[11] 周克发, 李雷, 盛金保. 我国溃坝生命损失评价模型初 步研究[J]. 安全与环境学报, 2007, 7(3): 145-149. 
ZHOU K F, LI L, SHENG J B. Evaluation model of loss of life due to dam breach in China[ J] . Journal of Safety and Environment, 2007, 7(3) : 145-149. 
[12] LI W, LI Z K, GE W, et al. Risk evaluation model of life loss caused by dam-break flood and its application [ J] . Water, 2019, 11(7) : 1359. 
[13] 葛巍, 焦余铁, 洪辛茜, 等. 基于 AHP-BN 法的溃坝 生命 损 失 风 险 评 价 [ J] . 郑 州 大 学 学 报 ( 工 学 版) , 2021, 42(3) : 8-12. 
GE W, JIAO Y T, HONG X Q, et al. Risk assessment of life loss caused by dam breach based on AHP-BN method[ J] . Journal of Zhengzhou University ( Engineering Science) , 2021, 42(3) : 8-12. 
[14] 尹卫霞, 余瀚, 崔淑娟, 等. 暴雨洪水灾害人口损失 评估 方 法 研 究 进 展 [ J] . 地 理 科 学 进 展, 2016, 35 (2) : 148-158. 
YIN W X, YU H, CUI S J, et al. Review on methods for estimating the loss of life induced by heavy rain and floods [ J] . Progress in Geography, 2016, 35(2) : 148-158. 
[15] VISCUSI W K. The role of publication selection bias in estimates of the value of a statistical life [ J] . American Journal of Health Economics, 2015, 1(1) : 27-52. 
[16] HAMMITT J K, ZHOU Y. The economic value of air-pollution-related health risks in China: a contingent valuation study[ J] . Environmental and Resource Economics, 2006, 33(3) : 399-423. 
[17] GUO X Q, HAMMITT J K. Compensating wage differentials with unemployment: evidence from China[J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2009, 42(2): 187-209. 
[18] CAO C J, SONG X K, CAI W J, et al. Estimating the value of a statistical life in China: a contingent valuation study in six representative cities[ J] . Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, 2023, 21( 4) : 269-278. 
[19] HAMMITT J K, HANINGER K. Valuing fatal risks to children and adults: effects of disease, latency, and risk aversion[ J] . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2010, 40 (1) : 57-83. 
[20] CARLSSON F, DARUVALA D, JALDELL H. Value of statistical life and cause of accident: a choice experiment [ J] . Risk Analysis, 2010, 30(6) : 975-986. 
[21] VEISTEN K, FLÜGEL S, RIZZI L I, et al. Valuing casualty risk reductions from estimated baseline risk [ J ] . Research in Transportation Economics, 2013, 43 ( 1 ) : 50-61. 
[22] MASTERMAN C J, VISCUSI W K. The income elasticity of global values of a statistical life: stated preference evidence [ J ] . Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2018, 9 (3) : 407-434. 
[23] World Bank Group. World bank open data [ EB / OL ] . [2024-10-09] . https: / / data. worldbank. org. cn / . 
[24] VISCUSI W K, MASTERMAN C. Anchoring biases in international estimates of the value of a statistical life[ J] . Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2017, 54 ( 2 ) : 103-128. 
[25] YANG Z, LIU P, XU X. Estimation of social value of statistical life using willingness-to-pay method in Nanjing, China[ J] . Accident Analysis and Prevention, 2016, 95: 308-316. 
[26] HOFFMANN S, KRUPNICK A, QIN P. Building a set of internationally comparable value of statistical life studies: estimates of Chinese willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk[ J] . Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, 2017, 8( 2) : 251-289.
[27] QIN X Z, LI L X, LIU Y Y. The value of life and its regional difference in China [ J] . China Agricultural Economic Review, 2013, 5(3) : 373-390.

更新日期/Last Update: 2025-07-13